Compulsory English : 2020 – 21

0
Compulsory Paper – II English | UPSC-Style Model Answers

🌐 Compulsory Paper – II English | Model Answers

35_CSM Compulsory Paper – II English
Full Marks: 300  |  Model Answers

1. Write an essay in about 1,000 words on any one of the following 100 marks

  • (a) Deforestation and the Environment
  • (b) Gender Inequality in the Indian Family
  • (c) Charms of the Outdoor Life
  • (d) Issues of Public Health in India

(a) Deforestation and the Environment

Deforestation is the permanent removal of trees and forests, usually to make way for agriculture, urbanisation, infrastructure, or logging. It is one of the most serious environmental challenges of our time, with far-reaching consequences for biodiversity, climate stability, and human well-being. Forests cover about 31 per cent of the Earth’s land surface, but they are disappearing at an alarming rate—an estimated 10 million hectares each year, an area roughly the size of Iceland. India, too, has suffered significant forest loss, despite its rich tradition of forest conservation.

The causes of deforestation are primarily economic. Forests are cleared for agriculture, as growing populations need more land to grow food. They are cleared for timber, which is used in construction and furniture. They are cleared for infrastructure—roads, dams, mines, and urban expansion. They are cleared for cattle ranching, particularly in the Amazon. In India, the pressures include shifting cultivation, fuelwood collection, illegal logging, and encroachment. In all cases, the immediate economic benefits accrue to a few, while the long-term environmental costs are borne by everyone.

The environmental consequences are severe. Forests are the lungs of the earth: they absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, thereby regulating the climate. When forests are destroyed, this carbon is released into the atmosphere, accelerating climate change. Forests are also home to the majority of terrestrial species; their destruction is the leading cause of biodiversity loss. Forests regulate the water cycle, preventing floods and droughts. Without them, soil erosion accelerates, rivers silt up, and agricultural productivity declines. In India, deforestation in the Himalayas has been linked to devastating floods and landslides, while deforestation in the Western Ghats threatens the region’s extraordinary biodiversity.

The human costs are equally grave. Forests are home to indigenous communities whose cultures and livelihoods depend on them. When forests are destroyed, these communities are displaced and impoverished. Forests provide fuelwood, fodder, and food to millions of rural households. They are a source of medicine, of employment, and of cultural identity. Deforestation also exacerbates climate change, which disproportionately affects the poor and vulnerable—small farmers, coastal communities, and slum dwellers.

The remedies are known, though they are not easy to implement. The first is to strengthen legal protection of forests. In India, the Forest Conservation Act of 1980 was a landmark, but enforcement has been uneven, and recent amendments have weakened its provisions. The second is to promote sustainable alternatives: agroforestry, which integrates trees into farming systems; community forest management, which gives local communities a stake in protecting forests; and the use of alternative materials for construction and fuel. The third is to address the underlying economic drivers: poverty, inequality, and the demand for cheap timber and agricultural products. The fourth is to restore degraded forests through afforestation and reforestation. India’s commitment to the Bonn Challenge—to restore 26 million hectares of degraded land by 2030—is a step in this direction.

In conclusion, deforestation is a grave environmental threat with profound consequences for climate, biodiversity, and human well-being. It is driven by economic forces that privilege short-term gain over long-term sustainability. The remedies are available, but they require political will, international cooperation, and the active participation of local communities. Forests are not merely a resource to be exploited; they are a life-support system that sustains us all. Protecting them is not a luxury but a necessity. The future of our planet—and of our children—depends on our ability to halt and reverse deforestation.

(b) Gender Inequality in the Indian Family

The Indian family, celebrated as the cornerstone of Indian culture and social stability, is also a site of profound gender inequality. From birth to death, women and girls face discrimination, deprivation, and violence within the family—not always at the hands of strangers, but often at the hands of those who are supposed to love and protect them. This inequality is so deeply embedded in social norms that it is often invisible, accepted as “natural” or “traditional.” Yet its consequences are devastating—for women, for families, and for society as a whole.

The first manifestation of gender inequality is sex-selective abortion and female infanticide. Despite laws prohibiting prenatal sex determination, India’s child sex ratio has declined dramatically in many states, reflecting a deep-seated preference for sons. The reasons are complex: sons are seen as economic assets who will support their parents in old age and perform last rites; daughters are seen as economic liabilities who require dowry and whose earnings will benefit another family. This son preference is the most extreme expression of gender inequality, but it is rooted in the same logic that devalues girls throughout their lives.

Within the family, girls receive less education, less nutrition, and less healthcare than boys. They are expected to do more household chores and to care for siblings. They are socialised into submissiveness and deference, while boys are encouraged to be assertive and independent. When resources are scarce, it is the girl who is withdrawn from school, the girl who eats last, the girl whose medical treatment is delayed. These disparities are not always the result of deliberate cruelty; they are the product of deeply internalised norms that make such discrimination seem natural.

Marriage brings new forms of inequality. Dowry, though illegal, remains widespread; it is a transaction that treats women as property and burdens their families with debt. After marriage, women often move into their husband’s household, where they may be subordinate to their mother-in-law and expected to bear children—preferably sons. Domestic violence, both physical and emotional, is alarmingly common; according to the National Family Health Survey, more than 30 per cent of married women have experienced some form of spousal violence. Marital rape is not even criminalised in India. Women’s property rights, inheritance rights, and reproductive autonomy are all constrained by family norms.

The consequences of gender inequality in the family extend far beyond the family. It limits women’s education and employment, reducing national productivity and perpetuating poverty. It normalises violence, creating a culture in which abuse is tolerated. It deprives children—both boys and girls—of the experience of equality, thereby reproducing the cycle of discrimination. And it undermines democracy, for a society that treats half its members as second-class citizens cannot claim to be truly democratic.

The remedies must be both legal and social. Legal reforms have been substantial—the prohibition of dowry, the criminalisation of domestic violence, the recognition of women’s inheritance rights—but enforcement remains weak. Social change is more difficult. It requires education that challenges gender stereotypes; economic opportunities that empower women; media representations that portray women as full human beings; and community mobilisation that engages men and boys in the struggle for equality. Women’s collectives, self-help groups, and grassroots activism have shown that change is possible.

In conclusion, gender inequality in the Indian family is a deep-rooted injustice that requires sustained and multifaceted action. It is not enough to change laws; we must change minds. The family, which should be a haven of love and security, must become a site of equality and mutual respect. Only then can India fulfil its constitutional promise of equality and dignity for all its citizens.

(c) Charms of the Outdoor Life

In an age dominated by screens, deadlines, and concrete jungles, the charms of the outdoor life have never been more precious—or more neglected. The outdoor life offers a sanctuary from the stresses of modern living, a return to the rhythms of nature, and a reconnection with the simple pleasures that make us fully human. Whether it is a walk in the park, a trek in the mountains, a swim in the sea, or an afternoon in the garden, the outdoors has a unique power to heal, to inspire, and to restore.

The physical benefits of the outdoor life are well documented. Fresh air and sunlight are essential for health, providing Vitamin D and improving respiratory function. Exercise in the open air—walking, cycling, running, swimming—strengthens the heart, muscles, and bones. Studies have shown that spending time in nature lowers blood pressure, reduces inflammation, and improves immune function. In a country like India, where lifestyle diseases—diabetes, hypertension, obesity—are reaching epidemic proportions, the outdoor life offers an accessible and affordable form of prevention.

The mental and emotional benefits are equally significant. Nature has a remarkable capacity to calm the anxious mind. The Japanese practice of shinrin-yoku, or “forest bathing,” has been scientifically shown to reduce stress hormones and improve mood. The sights, sounds, and smells of the natural world—the rustle of leaves, the song of birds, the scent of rain on dry earth—soothe the nervous system and restore a sense of perspective. In a world of constant notifications and endless to-do lists, the outdoors offers something precious: silence, stillness, and the experience of being present in the moment.

The outdoor life also fosters social connection. It brings families and friends together in shared activities—a picnic, a game of cricket, a camping trip—that create memories and strengthen bonds. In India, the outdoor life has a rich cultural tradition: the evening stroll in the park, the kite-flying festival of Makar Sankranti, the community festivals that bring people into the open air. These traditions remind us that the outdoors is not just a place to exercise; it is a place to live.

For children, the outdoor life is essential. Children who spend time outdoors are more active, more creative, and more socially adept. They learn to take risks, to solve problems, and to appreciate the natural world. In an era of “nature-deficit disorder,” when children spend more time indoors than ever before, the outdoors is a vital corrective. It teaches them that the world is larger than their screens, that adventure is available for free, and that the greatest playground is the one that has no walls.

The charms of the outdoor life are not limited to physical activity. They include the simple pleasures of gardening, birdwatching, stargazing, and picnicking. They include the satisfaction of growing one’s own vegetables, the thrill of spotting a rare bird, the awe of a clear night sky. These activities are inexpensive, accessible, and deeply rewarding. They remind us that happiness is not something that can be bought; it is something that can be found, often in the simplest of places.

In conclusion, the outdoor life is a source of physical health, mental well-being, social connection, and simple joy. It is a birthright that we have neglected at our peril. In a world that is increasingly indoor, digital, and sedentary, the outdoors offers an antidote. It invites us to step outside, to breathe deeply, to move our bodies, and to reconnect with the natural world that sustains us. The charms of the outdoor life are not a luxury; they are a necessity. It is time to rediscover them.

(d) Issues of Public Health in India

India’s public health system is at a crossroads. On the one hand, the country has made remarkable progress in recent decades: life expectancy has risen, infant mortality has fallen, and diseases like polio and guinea worm have been eradicated. On the other hand, India faces a complex and evolving set of public health challenges that threaten to overwhelm its underfunded and overstretched health system. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of this system in the most dramatic way possible. The question is whether India can build a public health infrastructure worthy of its ambitions—and its people.

The first major issue is the burden of communicable diseases. Despite progress, tuberculosis remains a leading cause of death, and India accounts for a quarter of the world’s TB cases. Malaria, dengue, and other vector-borne diseases continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat, rendering once-treatable infections lethal. And the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how quickly a new pathogen can bring the entire system to its knees. Communicable diseases disproportionately affect the poor, who live in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions and lack access to timely treatment.

The second issue is the rising burden of non-communicable diseases. India is in the midst of an epidemiological transition. As incomes rise and lifestyles change, diseases like diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and cancer are becoming increasingly common. India already has the second-largest number of diabetics in the world, and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death. These conditions are chronic, expensive to treat, and often preventable. They place a massive burden on individuals, families, and the health system.

The third issue is the inadequacy of public health infrastructure. Government spending on health in India is among the lowest in the world—about 2 per cent of GDP, compared to 17 per cent in the United States and 10 per cent in many European countries. Public hospitals are overcrowded and understaffed; rural health centres are often without doctors, medicines, or equipment. The private sector provides a large share of healthcare, but it is expensive and unregulated, leading to catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditures that push millions of families into poverty each year.

The fourth issue is inequality. Health outcomes in India vary dramatically by state, by income, by caste, and by gender. A child born in Kerala has a far better chance of surviving infancy than a child born in Bihar. A woman from a Scheduled Caste is more likely to die in childbirth than a woman from a higher caste. The poor rely on the public system, which is underfunded; the rich use the private system, which is expensive. This dual system reinforces existing inequalities and undermines the principle of health as a right.

The fifth issue is the shortage of health workers. India has one of the lowest ratios of doctors, nurses, and midwives to population in the world. The shortage is particularly acute in rural areas, where most Indians live. The result is that patients often travel long distances to receive care, or rely on unqualified practitioners. The shortage is compounded by poor working conditions, low pay, and inadequate training.

The remedies are known. India needs to increase public spending on health dramatically—to at least 5 per cent of GDP, as recommended by the National Health Policy. It needs to strengthen primary healthcare, so that common conditions can be treated close to home. It needs to invest in public health surveillance and disease prevention. It needs to regulate the private sector and expand health insurance. And it needs to address the social determinants of health—poverty, education, sanitation, nutrition—which are the root causes of much ill health.

In conclusion, India’s public health challenges are formidable, but they are not insurmountable. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a wake-up call, and there is now a widespread recognition that health is not a luxury but a foundation of national development. The task is to translate this recognition into sustained investment and systemic reform. A healthy India is a prerequisite for a prosperous India. The time to act is now.

2. Read the text below and answer the questions that follow 6×5 = 30 marks

Passage: Gandhi had profound things to say on the practice of ahimsa. For him, it was wrongly understood as not causing harm. If an animal was dying of an interminable disease and had only a few hours left to live, it was an act of love to end its life with a fatal injection. It involved violence, but was not a violent act. As Gandhi once said, not ‘non-violence’ but ‘compassion’ or ‘love’ was the correct English translation of ahimsa.

There are also several other respects in which Gandhi stretched and deepened the concept of ahimsa. In the Indian traditions, harm is defined widely to include not only physical but also psychological, moral and other forms of pida or klesa (pain).

Gandhi not only accepted this broad definition, but stretched it further. In his view, one might harm or kill a man by shooting him or by denying him the basic necessities of life over a period of time. Whether one killed him ‘at a stroke’ or ‘by inches’, the result was the same, and the individual involved was guilty of violence. Insulting, demeaning or humiliating others, diminishing their self-respect, speaking harsh words, passing harsh judgements, anger and mental cruelty were also forms of harm.

Gandhi’s idea of ahimsa was the basis of the practice of Satyagraha, involving transforming others through one’s suffering. He called it a ‘surgery of the soul’. A satyagrahi took his stand on what he considered to be his true or just demand, but kept open the possibility of revising his views in the light of his struggle.

He appealed to the better instincts of his opponent, activated his conscience, broadened his mind and heart, and sought his cooperation in looking for and achieving a just resolution. Although Gandhi was a deeply religious man, he could not be more different from a fanatic or a fundamentalist. This was so because he firmly believed that no religion was perfect and that it must subject itself to the test of human reason and experience. It could never be perfect because it was revealed or communicated in a particular language, at a particular point in history, and was subject to a variety of interpretations.

Since this was so, every religion deserved respect. It also had much to learn from others, and should therefore approach them in a spirit of humility. Gandhi himself provided an excellent example of this by borrowing freely from other religions, especially Christianity and blending it beautifully with Hinduism.

Gandhi’s guiding principle was, let noble thoughts come to us from all directions. He wanted to live in a house with walls to protect him but with windows wide open to allow fresh currents of thought. In a profound sense, Gandhi is one of the first theorists and practitioners of multiculturalism or a creative dialogue between cultures. His way of understanding the nature of religion guarded against fanaticism and has great relevance to our troubled world.

Gandhi’s idea of political leadership is also fascinating and inspirational. As a leader of a national movement, he was extremely conscious of what was expected of a leader and what the limits of his power were. When he felt his non-cooperation movement had gone in a wrong direction and turned violent, he called it a Himalayan blunder and stopped it. It is difficult to think of any leader in history who publicly acknowledged his mistake and even tried to rectify it. Gandhi seems to have felt the same way about communal violence, especially between 1946 and 1948. He thought he had perhaps not paid the matter sufficient attention. As someone who tormented himself over the smallest error of judgement, Gandhi took personal responsibility for it and threw all that he had, including his life, into his fight against violence.

(a) How did Gandhi expand the concept of Ahimsa? [6]
→ Gandhi expanded the concept of Ahimsa in several significant ways. First, he rejected the narrow understanding of ahimsa as merely “not causing harm,” arguing instead that it meant “compassion” or “love.” He gave the example of ending the life of a dying animal with a fatal injection: this involved violence but was not a violent act, because it was motivated by love. Second, he accepted the Indian tradition’s broad definition of harm, which includes not just physical but also psychological and moral pain. Third, he stretched this definition further by arguing that denying someone the basic necessities of life over time is as much an act of violence as shooting them; the result is the same. Finally, he included insults, humiliation, harsh words, anger, and mental cruelty within the ambit of harm and violence.

(b) What was the relation between Ahimsa and Satyagraha? [6]
→ Ahimsa was the foundation of Satyagraha, Gandhi’s method of non-violent resistance. Satyagraha involved transforming others through one’s own suffering—what Gandhi called a “surgery of the soul.” A satyagrahi took a stand on what he considered a just demand, but remained open to revising his views in the light of the struggle. Through his willingness to suffer without retaliation, the satyagrahi appealed to the better instincts of his opponent, activated his conscience, and sought his cooperation in achieving a just resolution. Satyagraha was thus the practical application of ahimsa in the political sphere: it sought to convert the opponent rather than defeat him, and it relied on love and suffering rather than violence and coercion.

(c) What were Gandhi’s views on religion? [6]
→ Gandhi was a deeply religious man, but he was the opposite of a fanatic or fundamentalist. He firmly believed that no religion was perfect, because every religion was revealed or communicated in a particular language, at a particular point in history, and was therefore subject to a variety of interpretations. He insisted that religion must be subject to the test of human reason and experience. Consequently, he believed that every religion deserved respect and had much to learn from others, and should approach them with humility. He himself borrowed freely from other religions, especially Christianity, blending it with Hinduism. His guiding principle was “let noble thoughts come to us from all directions”—he wanted to live in a house with walls to protect him but with windows wide open to allow fresh currents of thought.

(d) What was Gandhi’s idea of political leadership? [6]
→ Gandhi’s idea of political leadership was based on self-awareness, accountability, and humility. As a leader of a national movement, he was deeply conscious of what was expected of a leader and of the limits of his power. He was willing to acknowledge his mistakes publicly and to rectify them. When he felt that his non-cooperation movement had gone in the wrong direction and turned violent, he called it a “Himalayan blunder” and stopped it. He took personal responsibility for communal violence, especially between 1946 and 1948, and threw all his energy—including his life—into the fight against it. He was a leader who tormented himself over the smallest error of judgement, and who saw leadership as a form of service rather than a source of power.

(e) What happened when Gandhi made a mistake? [6]
→ When Gandhi made a mistake, he acknowledged it publicly and took personal responsibility for it. When his non-cooperation movement turned violent, he called it a “Himalayan blunder” and stopped it immediately. He did not blame others or make excuses. Similarly, when he felt that he had not paid sufficient attention to communal violence between 1946 and 1948, he took personal responsibility for it and threw all his energy—including his life—into the fight against violence. This willingness to admit error and to correct course is extremely rare among leaders, and it is a mark of Gandhi’s moral greatness.

3. Expand the idea of any one of the following 20 marks

(a) Actions speak louder than words

The proverb “Actions speak louder than words” is a simple statement with profound implications. It means that what a person does is a more reliable indicator of their true character and intentions than what they say. Words are easy—anyone can promise, flatter, or profess. But actions require effort, commitment, and courage. They reveal our real priorities, our true values, and our actual capabilities.

This is true in personal relationships. A friend who says he will help you but never does is not a true friend. A partner who says “I love you” but treats you with disrespect is not showing love. Words of apology are meaningless without a change in behaviour. In all these cases, actions are the test of sincerity. We trust people not by what they say but by what they do.

It is true in public life as well. Politicians are famous for making promises they do not keep. A government that claims to care about the poor but cuts funding for welfare programmes is revealing its true priorities. A leader who preaches honesty but lies to the public is not an honest leader. Citizens should judge their leaders not by their rhetoric but by their record. This is the essence of democratic accountability.

It is also true in our own lives. We may tell ourselves that we value health, or learning, or our families. But if we spend all our time at work, never exercise, and never read, our actions are telling a different story. The proverb is a call to self-examination: do our actions match our words? If not, it is our actions—not our words—that reveal who we really are.

In conclusion, “Actions speak louder than words” is a reminder that character is revealed in conduct, not in speech. It is easy to talk; it is harder to act. The people we admire most are those whose actions match their words—who do what they say they will do, who live by the values they profess. In a world full of empty promises and hollow rhetoric, the person of action stands out as a person of integrity.

(b) Cleanliness is next to godliness

The proverb “Cleanliness is next to godliness” expresses a truth that is both practical and spiritual. It suggests that cleanliness—of body, of environment, and of mind—is a virtue that brings us closer to the divine. The idea is found in many religious traditions, from the ritual purity laws of Hinduism and Judaism to the emphasis on cleanliness in Islam and Christianity. But the proverb is not only about religious ritual; it is about the relationship between outer order and inner purity.

On the practical level, cleanliness is essential for health. Dirty water, unhygienic food, and unsanitary surroundings are the leading causes of disease in India and around the world. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, launched in 2014, recognised that cleanliness is not merely a matter of aesthetics but a matter of life and death. By building toilets, improving waste management, and promoting hygiene, the campaign has saved lives and improved the quality of life for millions of people. Cleanliness, in this sense, is a form of compassion—it is the duty we owe to our neighbours and to ourselves.

On the spiritual level, cleanliness reflects a disciplined mind. A person who keeps their home clean is likely to be a person who values order, respect, and care. Cleanliness is a form of self-respect and respect for others. It is also a form of mindfulness: the act of cleaning is a meditation on the present moment, a way of attending to the details of life. In this sense, cleanliness is a spiritual practice.

The proverb also has a social dimension. A clean environment is a common good. When one person litters, others suffer. When a community keeps its streets clean, everyone benefits. Cleanliness is therefore a form of civic virtue—a recognition that we are not isolated individuals but members of a shared community. The person who keeps their surroundings clean is contributing to the common good, and in doing so, is participating in a form of collective worship.

In conclusion, “Cleanliness is next to godliness” is a proverb that captures a deep truth about human life. Cleanliness of body, environment, and mind is not a superficial concern but a fundamental virtue. It promotes health, expresses respect, cultivates discipline, and builds community. In a country like India, where cleanliness is often neglected, the proverb is a call to action. Godliness may be a distant goal, but cleanliness is within our reach—and it is the first step towards a better life.

(c) Laughter is the best medicine

The proverb “Laughter is the best medicine” captures a truth that modern science has begun to confirm. Laughter is not merely a response to something funny; it is a powerful therapeutic tool that benefits both body and mind. In a world burdened by stress, anxiety, and illness, laughter offers a free, accessible, and side-effect-free remedy.

The physical benefits of laughter are well documented. Laughter reduces the levels of stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline, and increases the production of endorphins, the body’s natural painkillers. It lowers blood pressure, improves blood flow, and boosts the immune system. A good laugh exercises the diaphragm, abdominal muscles, and even the heart. Studies have shown that people who laugh regularly are less likely to suffer from heart disease and more likely to recover quickly from illness.

The mental and emotional benefits are equally significant. Laughter is a natural antidote to stress, anxiety, and depression. It provides a momentary escape from worry, a release of tension, and a sense of perspective. When we laugh at our problems, they seem smaller; when we laugh with others, we feel connected. Humour helps us to cope with adversity, to reframe difficult situations, and to maintain hope. In this sense, laughter is not an escape from reality but a way of confronting it with resilience.

Laughter also has important social benefits. Shared laughter is a powerful bonding mechanism. It builds trust, strengthens relationships, and creates a sense of community. In a world that is increasingly polarised and isolated, laughter can be a unifying force—a reminder of our common humanity. This is why laughter is often said to be contagious: when we hear others laughing, we cannot help but join in.

The proverb has important implications for healthcare. Doctors and therapists increasingly recognise the value of humour in treatment. Laughter therapy, clown doctors, and comedy programmes in hospitals are all based on the insight that laughter can promote healing. In a country like India, where healthcare is often grim and under-resourced, the healing power of laughter is especially valuable.

In conclusion, “Laughter is the best medicine” is more than a cliché; it is a profound truth. Laughter heals the body, soothes the mind, and connects us to others. It is free, available to everyone, and has no harmful side effects. In a world that takes itself too seriously, the ability to laugh—at ourselves, at our circumstances, at the absurdity of life—is a precious gift. It is a form of wisdom, and a source of joy.

(d) Time is money

The proverb “Time is money” is a familiar saying, often attributed to Benjamin Franklin. It expresses the idea that time is a valuable resource that should not be wasted, because time is the raw material of all achievement. Every hour spent idly is an hour that could have been used productively. In a competitive world, the efficient use of time can be the difference between success and failure.

The economic logic behind the proverb is straightforward. In the workplace, time is literally money: workers are paid by the hour, and businesses measure productivity by output per unit of time. The person who wastes time is losing money—either their own or their employer’s. The person who uses time efficiently is creating value. In a market economy, time management is a core skill, as important as technical competence or interpersonal ability.

But the proverb has a deeper meaning that goes beyond economics. Time is the one resource that is equally distributed—everyone has 24 hours a day—and yet it is the one resource that can never be recovered. Money can be earned, borrowed, or stolen; time can only be spent. Once a moment is gone, it is gone forever. This is why time is so precious. The person who understands this lives with urgency and purpose, while the person who does not wastes their life in trivialities.

The proverb is also a warning against procrastination. Procrastination is the thief of time; it is the habit of putting off important tasks for later, until later becomes never. The consequences of procrastination are not just missed opportunities but also stress, guilt, and a sense of failure. The person who overcomes procrastination—who acts decisively and promptly—achieves more and feels better about themselves.

However, the proverb must be understood with nuance. Not all time must be “productive” in the economic sense. Rest, leisure, and play are also essential to a good life. The person who obsessively converts every moment into money is missing the point of life. The proverb is a call to use time wisely, not to treat it as a commodity to be maximised. Wisdom lies in balancing work, rest, and relationships—in using time in a way that reflects one’s values.

In conclusion, “Time is money” is a proverb that captures an important truth: time is a precious and finite resource that must be used with care. It is a reminder to act promptly, to avoid procrastination, and to value the present moment. But it is also a reminder that the value of time cannot be measured in money alone. Time is the fabric of life; how we use it determines who we become.

4. Write a précis of the following text in about 350 words 40 marks

An oft-quoted legal maxim is that ignorance of the law is no excuse. However, in order for citizens to know the law, it is necessary that the law be made available to them in an affordable, accessible manner—most importantly, in a language they can understand. This is no simple task in a democracy of a billion-plus people speaking 121 languages. Even three-quarters of a century after independence and over two decades after the birth of the internet, the Indian state is still struggling to make available all Indian laws available to Indian citizens in languages they can understand. Three specific policy issues stand out in this context: the India Code website launched by the legislative department, the plain language drafting movement, and lastly, the issue of authorised translations of law.

After a law is enacted by Parliament and receives the President’s assent, it is published in the Gazette of India. This version, considered the authoritative text of the law and recognised in the evidence act, is relied upon by courts. In reality, the gazette has been relatively inaccessible and the legal community mostly relies on commercial databases. The India Code website, which is supposed to make legislation available, disclaims any warranty of accuracy and uses obsolete technology, making it difficult to access different versions of the law in time. Foreign government websites, by contrast, use modern computer languages such as Akoma Ntoso and offer API access that allows innovators to build useful applications.

Besides access to laws, an important question is the form of the law itself. Only when the text of law is drafted in plain language will there be a benefit for citizens. There is no movement for plain language drafting in India—though this has been recognised as a basic right internationally. The plain language movement sees communication of the law to be a core aspect. Making sure a law discloses volumes of information in a manner that does not overload or confuse the reader became an important keystone. New Zealand, Germany, the UK, Australia and Hong Kong have been drafting legislation, guidelines or manuals to ensure plain language. The time has come for India, belated as it may be, to embrace the plain language drafting movement and enable citizens to make better-informed decisions.

Central legislation is generally published only in English and Hindi, a legal requirement under the Constitution and the Official Languages Act. No legal mandate exists for the government to translate the law into any of the other 121 languages spoken in India, or even into the 22 languages mentioned in the Eighth Schedule. Despite this, a presidential order was issued in 1960, creating the Official Languages (Legislative) Commission—now ‘Official Language Wing’ or OLW—which was tasked with translating central laws into regional languages enumerated in the Eighth Schedule. The process is hardly smooth, and crucial legislation, like the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, or even the IPC of 1860, are unavailable in some Eighth Schedule languages. The Authoritative Texts Act, 1973, guarantees authenticity only to translations into Eighth Schedule languages, which are only a fraction of the languages spoken in India. Access to such translated texts is another major issue. Three core aspects come to the fore: proper dissemination strategies and the latest technological standards must be adopted; the plain language approach will ensure that those affected by a law are in a position to ascertain its meaning and effect; and authoritative translations must be made available in all languages spoken in India.

Model Précis (≈200 words):

The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse presumes that citizens can access the law in an affordable, accessible manner and in a language they understand. In India, with 121 languages, this remains a distant goal even after 75 years of independence. Three policy issues stand out.

First, the India Code website, meant to make legislation available, disclaims any warranty of accuracy, uses obsolete technology, and lacks the user-friendly features of foreign government websites, which use modern formats like Akoma Ntoso and offer API access. Second, there is no movement for plain language drafting in India, though it is recognised internationally as a basic right. Countries like the UK, New Zealand, and Australia have rewritten legislation in plain language; India must follow suit so that citizens can understand the law that governs them. Third, central legislation is published only in English and Hindi. The Official Language Wing translates laws into Eighth Schedule languages, but the process is slow and flawed, and the Authoritative Texts Act, 1973, guarantees authenticity only for Eighth Schedule languages, excluding the vast majority of Indian languages.

Three remedies are essential: adoption of modern technological standards and dissemination strategies; a shift to plain language drafting; and authoritative translations in all languages spoken in India.

5. [A] Fill in the blanks 1×10 = 10 marks

Note: The original sentences in the PDF are partially illegible. The blanks below are reconstructed based on standard fill-in-the-blank exercises of this type. The answers provided are the most appropriate completions.

No.SentenceAppropriate Word
(a)The book was delivered ______ a week.within
(b)I started ______ stamps when I was seven years old.collecting
(c)They protested about the ______ of the new rules.unfairness (or: harshness)
(d)You rarely have to tell Mukesh twice; he is very ______.obedient (or: prompt)
(e)There was no ______ to be pessimistic.reason (or: need / cause)
(f)He was unhurt ______ from a small cut above his eye.apart (or: except)
(g)The teachers ______ to meet the student representatives.agreed (or: consented)
(h)Her death was due to ______ causes.natural
Note: Due to the illegible nature of the original PDF, the sentences above are reconstructions. The correct answers should be verified against the original question paper.

5. [B] Provide one-word substitutes for the expressions given below 1×10 = 10 marks

No.ExpressionOne-Word Substitute
(a)A soldier who fights for the sake of moneyMercenary
(b)That which cannot be seenInvisible
(c)A man whose wife is deadWidower
(d)A disease that can be spread by touchContagious
(e)A person who can neither read nor writeIlliterate
(f)A collection of people in a templeCongregation
(g)That which is not to the pointIrrelevant
(h)Fit to be chosenEligible
(i)The place where clothes are keptWardrobe
(j)Closed vehicle for carrying sick or wounded peopleAmbulance

5. [C] Use the following idioms in sentences of your own 2×5 = 10 marks

(a) Give the slip (to escape or evade someone)
→ The thief managed to give the police the slip and disappeared into the crowded market.

(b) Call on (to visit someone briefly; to appeal to someone)
→ The principal called on the students to volunteer for the cleanliness drive. (or: I will call on you tomorrow afternoon.)

(c) Get over (to recover from something; to overcome)
→ It took her several weeks to get over the shock of losing her job.

(d) Storm in a tea cup (a great fuss about a trivial matter)
→ The argument over the seating arrangement was a storm in a tea cup; it was resolved within minutes.

(e) From pillar to post (from one place to another, often in a frustrating search)
→ She ran from pillar to post to get her birth certificate corrected, but no office would help her.

6. [A] Write an antonym for each of the following words 1×5 = 5 marks

No.WordAntonym
(a)SmileFrown
(b)AttractionRepulsion
(c)HarmonyDiscord
(d)DiligentLazy (or: Indolent)
(e)OffensiveInoffensive (or: Pleasing)

6. [B] Write a synonym for each of the following words 1×5 = 5 marks

No.WordSynonym
(a)AmbiguousUnclear (or: Vague)
(b)ArduousDifficult (or: Strenuous)
(c)LethalDeadly (or: Fatal)
(d)FragileDelicate (or: Brittle)
(e)SterileBarren (or: Unproductive)

6. [C] Use suitable modals to complete the sentences 1×5 = 5 marks

(a) The farmers ______ in the field right from sunrise and will continue to do so till sunset.
→ The farmers must have been working in the field right from sunrise and will continue to do so till sunset. (or: have been working)

(b) My mother asked me when ______ have a glass of milk.
→ My mother asked me when I would have a glass of milk.

(c) Since 1992, there ______ no earthquakes here.
→ Since 1992, there have been no earthquakes here.

(d) If you’re feeling ill, I ______ at home today, if I were you.
→ If you’re feeling ill, I would stay at home today, if I were you.

(e) Ram isn’t home yet. He ______ have been held up at work.
→ Ram isn’t home yet. He must have been held up at work.

7. [A] Replace the underlined words with the correct phrasal verb from the brackets 1×5 = 5 marks

(a) His bank loan was wiped out. (written away, written off, written over)
→ His bank loan was written off.

(b) The Indian cricket team has acquired distinction. (won laurels, won the day, got through)
→ The Indian cricket team has won laurels.

(c) The female elephant went uncontrollably wild. (got the jitters, went berserk, hit the jackpot)
→ The female elephant went berserk.

(d) The opposing army yielded to abject subjection before Alexander’s might. (looked off colours, kicked up a row, licked the dust)
→ The opposing army licked the dust before Alexander’s might.

(e) The two friends quarrelled this afternoon. (fell on, fell out, fell through)
→ The two friends fell out this afternoon.

7. [B] Use the correct verb forms to complete the conditional sentences 1×5 = 5 marks

(a) Unless it ______ (rain), I’ll pick you up at 8.00.
→ Unless it rains, I’ll pick you up at 8.00.

(b) If it ______ for my friends, I wouldn’t have got the job.
→ If it had not been for my friends, I wouldn’t have got the job.

(c) If you ______ (leave) now, you’ll be home in two hours.
→ If you leave now, you’ll be home in two hours.

(d) If I ______ (understand) how it worked, I’d explain it to you.
→ If I understood how it worked, I’d explain it to you.

(e) If we ______ (travel) together we would have saved money.
→ If we had travelled together we would have saved money.

7. [C] (Unclear from PDF) 1×5 = 5 marks

The question appears to ask for word forms or similar. Based on the words provided (Explain, Assist, Permit, Lose, Leak), the task is likely to use the correct form of the word in a sentence or to form nouns/verbs/adjectives. Model answers are given below for noun forms:

WordNoun FormSentence
(a) ExplainExplanationHer explanation of the theory was very clear.
(b) AssistAssistanceHe offered his assistance to the flood victims.
(c) PermitPermissionYou need permission to enter the restricted area.
(d) LoseLossThe loss of his wallet caused him great inconvenience.
(e) LeakLeakageThe leakage from the pipe damaged the wall.

8. [A] Correct the errors in the sentences below 1×10 = 10 marks

No.Original SentenceCorrected Sentence
(a)He is the most wisest of all.He is the wisest of all.
(b)You well organised the function.You organised the function well.
(c)I had slept for hours.I slept for hours. (or: I had been sleeping for hours.)
(d)I am busy in my work.I am busy with my work.
(e)She finished her work when I met her.She had finished her work when I met her.
(f)It is time you go to bed.It is time you went to bed.
(g)He pays more attention to films than books.He pays more attention to films than to books.
(h)One should take care of his health.One should take care of one’s health.
(i)He does not know to swim.He does not know how to swim.
(j)My all family is going to visit the Taj.All my family is going to visit the Taj.

8. [B] Rewrite the sentences according to the instructions given in the brackets 1×10 = 10 marks

(a) I look forward to meet you at the station. (Correct the sentence)
→ I look forward to meeting you at the station.

(b) The teacher made him repeat his work. (Change it into passive voice)
→ He was made to repeat his work by the teacher.

(c) He said, “Will you listen to such a man?” (Put the sentence in indirect speech)
→ He asked if I would listen to such a man.

(d) I am going to ______ down for half an hour. (Choose the correct word to fill in the blank space: lie / lay)
→ I am going to lie down for half an hour.

(e) I cannot see you. (Add to the sentence a suitable adverb or adverbial expression of either time or place)
→ I cannot see you now. (or: here / today / from here)

(f) He screamed in great fear. One might think he had seen a ghost. (Join the two sentences into one by using ‘as if’)
→ He screamed in great fear as if he had seen a ghost.

(g) I desire to be a doctor. (Rewrite the sentence using the noun form of ‘desire’)
→ My desire is to be a doctor.

(h) The house is infested ______ rats. (Supply the appropriate preposition)
→ The house is infested with rats.

(i) us, God, will forgive, our sins. (Combine these words to form a sentence)
→ God will forgive us our sins.

(j) All the rooms are vacant. (Convert it into an interrogative sentence)
→ Are all the rooms vacant?

9. Translate the following into English 30 marks

Note: The original text in the PDF is in Odia and partially illegible. The passage provided is a legend about the Kalinga War and Emperor Ashoka, as narrated in Odia. Below is a full English translation based on the readable portions of the text.

ଓଡ଼ିଆ ମୂଳ ପାଠ (ଆନୁମାନିକ): ସେହି ସମୟରେ କଳିଙ୍ଗ ଯୁଦ୍ଧ ଘଟିଥିଲା, ଯାହା ଇତିହାସରେ ଏକ ମହତ୍ୱପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ଘଟଣା। ଏହି ଯୁଦ୍ଧରେ ଅଶୋକ ବିଜୟୀ ହେଲେ, କିନ୍ତୁ ଯୁଦ୍ଧର ଭୟଙ୍କର ପରିଣାମ ତାଙ୍କୁ ଗଭୀର ଭାବରେ ପ୍ରଭାବିତ କଲା। ସେ ଦେଖିଲେ ଯେ ଯୁଦ୍ଧରେ ଲକ୍ଷ ଲକ୍ଷ ଲୋକ ମୃତ୍ୟୁବରଣ କଲେ ଏବଂ ଅନେକ ଅନାଥ ହେଲେ। ଏହି ଦୃଶ୍ୟ ତାଙ୍କ ହୃଦୟକୁ ବିଦାରିତ କଲା। ସେ ବୁଝିଲେ ଯେ ହିଂସା ଦ୍ୱାରା କେବେ ହେଁ ଶାନ୍ତି ଆସିପାରିବ ନାହିଁ। ସେହି ଦିନଠାରୁ ସେ ବୌଦ୍ଧ ଧର୍ମ ଗ୍ରହଣ କଲେ ଏବଂ ଅହିଂସା ଓ କରୁଣାର ପଥରେ ଚାଲିବାକୁ ଲାଗିଲେ। ସେ ଘୋଷଣା କଲେ ଯେ ଆଉ କେବେ ଯୁଦ୍ଧ କରିବେ ନାହିଁ। ସେ କହିଲେ, “ମୁଁ ଆଉ କାହାରି ଉପରେ ଆକ୍ରମଣ କରିବି ନାହିଁ।” ଏହା ପରେ ସେ ଶିଳାଲେଖ ମାଧ୍ୟମରେ ଶାନ୍ତି, ସହନଶୀଳତା ଏବଂ ନୈତିକତାର ବାର୍ତ୍ତା ପ୍ରଚାର କଲେ। ତାଙ୍କର ଏହି ପରିବର୍ତ୍ତନ ଭାରତୀୟ ଇତିହାସରେ ଏକ ଅମିଟ ଛାପ ପକାଇଲା।

English Translation:

At that time the Kalinga War took place, which is a significant event in history. Ashoka was victorious in this war, but the terrible consequences of the war deeply affected him. He saw that lakhs of people died in the war and many became orphans. This scene tore his heart. He understood that peace can never come through violence. From that day he embraced Buddhism and began to walk on the path of non-violence and compassion. He declared that he would never wage war again. He said, “I will not attack anyone anymore.” After this, he spread the message of peace, tolerance, and morality through his inscriptions. This transformation of his left an indelible mark on Indian history.

📊 Marking Scheme Summary

QuestionContentMarks
1Essay (any one; all four modelled above)100
2Passage comprehension (5 × 6)30
3Expansion of idea (any one; all four modelled above)20
4Précis40
5[A]Fill in the blanks (10 × 1)10
5[B]One-word substitutes (10 × 1)10
5[C]Idiom sentences (5 × 2)10
6[A]Antonyms (5 × 1)5
6[B]Synonyms (5 × 1)5
6[C]Modals (5 × 1)5
7[A]Phrasal verbs (5 × 1)5
7[B]Conditional verb forms (5 × 1)5
7[C]Word forms (5 × 1)5
8[A]Error correction (10 × 1)10
8[B]Rewrite sentences (10 × 1)10
9Translation30
Total300
📝 Examiner’s note for top marks: In the essay, examiners reward a clear thesis, structured paragraphs, concrete examples, and a decisive conclusion. In comprehension, answers must be brief yet analytical, drawing directly from the passage. In the précis, the passage must be compressed to roughly one-third, in the candidate’s own words, retaining all key ideas. For grammar and vocabulary questions, the exact correct form must be given—partial corrections lose marks. In translation, fidelity to the original meaning and grammatical correctness in English are essential.